tastyhumanburgers:

lady-nevada:

writeswrongs:

cumaeansibyl:

peeingisfreeing:

coffeeandconlangs:

Unnecessary “fillers” in our speech. I’d rather have “like” than up-talking, though (if we had to choose one, that is). Ewwww, up-talking. Then again, a combination of the two would render me homicidal maniac.

yes, colloquial speech is stupid

discourse particles are stupid

quotative particles are stupid

fillers are stupid

lower registers of speech = stupid!!!!!!woah aaa/

Like, did you ever notice? That, like, the speech patterns people, like, think are stupid? Are, like, commonly associated with, like, women?

And, like, there’s this thing? Where, like, women aren’t supposed to be, like, assertive? So they, like, qualify their speech? Because, like, we’re not supposed to, like, stand by our opinions?

1) humiliate women so they don’t feel qualified to speak authoritatively about anything

2) humiliate women for speaking in such a way that reflects how you treat her

3) laugh, you are superior because you don’t use words like “like.” It isn’t as if being a huge stupid asshole has ever made you worse than a woman who speaks with verbal tics.

Holy shit

Reblogging because the “Acadamy of Linguistic Awarness” spelled “academy” and “awareness” wrong on what may be the most pretentious (and unnecessary) poster I’ve ever seen.

(via fuckingrapeculture)

scrotumcoat:

whatchu say bout me bish?

(Source: hauntedpenis11)

(Source: godnibblets, via goddamntranny)

(via regretandchinesefood)

regretandchinesefood:

Lawd

(Source: bag-of-brains, via werespectdarkwomen)